Loading
Loading

Clan Moffat

I HOPE FOR BETTER THINGS


Clan Moffat originate from the Scottish Borders. Unlike many clans who took their name from their surrounding area, the ancestor of the Moffats likely gave his name to the border town of the same name.

An influential power from as early as the 14th century, the Moffats were Border Reivers and had fierce rivalries with their neighbouring clans, particularly the Johnstons. Clan Moffat was without a chief from the mid-16th century until 1983, when Francis Moffat waas recognised by Lord Lyon King of Arms.

The Moffat clan motto is "Spero meliora" (I hope for better things) and the clan crest is a cross crosslet fitchee rising from a crown.

Scottish History

of Clan Moffat


Living on the frontline

There are two equally plausible explanations for the origin of the surname of Moffat, but whatever its origin, bearers of the name today can lay claim to a descent from one of the oldest and most famous – and frequently infamous – families of the Scottish Borders.

The Highlands and Islands had their closely knit communities of clans, with their own heritage and traditions, while the communities of families of the Borders were also fiercely proud of their own ancient homeland and glorious deeds and exploits.

No less so than with the Moffats, with the many branches of the family dominating the very landscape of the Borders for centuries.

One claim is that the progenitor, or ‘name-father’, of the Moffats was a Norman known as William de Mont Alto, who had settled in present day Annandale, in Dumfriesshire, at some stage in the tenth century.

This was at least 200 years before those Normans who had settled in England in the wake of the Norman Conquest of 1066 came north to settle in Scotland.

William de Mont Alto’s name, it is claimed, gradually assumed the form of ‘Moffat’, after going through variations that included ‘Montealt’ and ‘Movat’, and it was through this that the town of Moffat acquired its name.

Another theory, however, is that rather than the town taking its name from someone who had settled there, the ‘Moffats’ took their name from the town itself.

According to this theory, ‘Moffat’ stems from the Scottish Gaelic ‘magh fada’, or the Irish Gaelic ‘mai-fad’, both meaning ‘long plain’, and the area in which Moffat lies certainly meets with this topographical description.

A confusing variety of forms of the name surfaced over the centuries, including Moffatt, Moffet, Moffett, Moffit, Maffat, Muffet, Morphit, Mufet, and Movat – and it is interesting to note that the most common spelling of the name today in Northern Ireland, where many ‘Moffats’ settled in the seventeenth century, is ‘Moffett’.

As confusing as the variety of forms of the name is the rather bewildering genealogy of the Moffats, who appear to have been particularly virile and fertile considering the numerous branches of the family that were spawned over the centuries!

What was then the small hamlet of Moffat, in Annandale, was certainly the hub from which the family branched out.

A land charter in the barony of Westerkirk was granted to the family in 1300, while 260 years later no less than eleven branches of the family were recorded – including the Moffats of Wachopegill, Craigholm, Meckleholm, Ericstane, and Bludewise, and the prosperous lairds of Granton, Auldton, and Knock.

One of the earliest members of the family to be mentioned in the historical record is Nicholas de Mufet, who witnessed a charter by the Bishop of Glasgow in 1230, while he himself became bishop in 1268.

Known as the ‘Laughing Archdeacon of Teviotdale’, he died two years later, however, apparently without being officially consecrated, and one theory is that this was because he had refused to pay the Church in Rome the necessary fee for the honour.

Much of the high romance and drama associated with the Moffats begins with their involvement in Scotland’s bitter and bloody Wars of Independence with its English neighbour.

Situated as they were on the Borders, the Moffats, in common with other Border families, were literally in the frontline of a conflict that frequently laid waste to their lands and possessions.

A Robert and a Thomas de Moffett were among the signatories in 1296 to a humiliating treaty of fealty, known as the Ragman Roll, to the conquering Edward I, known and loathed as the ‘Hammer of the Scots’.

Signed by 1,500 earls, bishops, and burgesses, the parchment is known as the Ragman Roll because of the profusion of ribbons that dangle from the seals of the signatories.

With Scotland under the iron grip of English occupation at the time, those who signed had little option but to do so – but the humiliation was avenged when William Wallace sparked off a revolt in May of 1297, after slaying Sir William Heselrig, Sheriff of Lanark.

An expert in the tactics of guerrilla warfare, Wallace led his hardened band of freedom fighters, including the Moffats, on a series of lightning campaigns that inflicted stunning defeats on the English garrisons.

One of Wallace’s many temporary headquarters was located in the near-impenetrable depths of what was then the great forest of Selkirk, and among his fellow ‘bravehearts’ were the Moffats, who knew every hidden pathway.

The Moffats are also on record for the vital role they played in 1297 in helping Wallace to set up an ambush by constructing a ditch deep enough to hide a man on horseback.

Wallace’s campaigns culminated in the liberation of practically all of Scotland following the battle of Stirling Bridge, on September 11, 1297, but defeat followed at the battle of Falkirk in July of the following year.

He was eventually betrayed and captured in August of 1305, and, on August 23 of that year, he was brutally executed in London on the orders of a vengeful Edward I.

Chained to a hurdle, he was dragged by horses from Westminster to Smithfield, where he then suffered the horrific fate of castration and disembowelment while still alive.

His genitals and entrails were burned before his eyes before his agony finally ended with a mighty stroke of the headman’s axe.

As if this was not enough, his heart was then torn from his body and thrown into the flames, while his body was further butchered by being hacked into four pieces.

These four quarters were despatched to be put on display at Newcastle-on-Tyne, Berwick, Stirling, and Perth, while his head was mounted on a pike on London Bridge.

Edward had hoped that Wallace’s gruesome fate would serve as an example to others and discourage further revolt against English occupation of Scotland, but it only served to further enrage and inflame patriotic passion.

Robert the Bruce, who was enthroned as King of Scots at Scone in March of 1306, took up the banner of revolt again and among his stalwart supporters were the Moffats.

It is known that Adam Moffat of Knock and his brother supplied forty of the skilled riders that made up the 500-strong Scottish light cavalry under the command of Sir Robert Keith at the battle of Bannockburn in June of 1314, when a 20,000-strong English army under Edward II was defeated by a Scots army less than half this strength.

By the midsummer of 1313 the mighty fortress of Stirling Castle was occupied by an English garrison under the command of Sir Philip Mowbray.

Bruce’s brother, Edward, rashly agreed to a pledge by Mowbray that if the castle was not relieved by battle by midsummer of the following year, then he would surrender.

This made battle inevitable, and by June 23 of 1314 the two armies faced one another at Bannockburn, in sight of the castle.

It was on this day that Bruce slew the English knight Sir Henry de Bohun in single combat, but the battle proper was not fought until the following day, shortly after the rise of the midsummer sun.

The English cavalry launched a desperate but futile charge on the densely packed ranks of Scottish spearmen known as schiltrons, and by the time the sun had sank slowly in the west the English army had been totally routed.

At one crucial stage in the battle, English archers had been able to rain a deadly hail of arrows onto one of the Scottish divisions, and it was Sir Robert Keith and his light cavalry, including the Moffat contingent, that saved the day by charging the archers and dispersing them.

Raiders of the West March

The Moffats acted for a time as trusted ambassadors for their country, with William de Moffete on record as having received a safe conduct pass from the English court in his role as the ambassador of Bruce’s son and heir, David II.

In 1337, Walter de Moffet, the archdeacon of Midlothian, was appointed ambassador to the French royal court.

The Moffats were destined to fall from favour, however, and this was because of the lawless environment that frequently prevailed in the Scottish Borders.

They were among the feared body of families known as riding clans, or reivers, who took their name from their time-honoured custom of reiving, or raiding, not only their neighbours’ livestock, but also that of their neighbours across the border.

The word ‘bereaved’, for example, indicating to have suffered loss, derives from the original ‘reived’, meaning to have suffered loss of property.

A constant thorn in the flesh of both the English and Scottish authorities was the cross-border raiding and pillaging carried out by well-mounted and heavily armed men, the contingent from the Scottish side of the border known and feared as ‘moss troopers.’

In an attempt to bring order to what was known as the wild ‘debateable land’ on both sides of the border, Alexander II of Scotland had in 1237 signed the Treaty of York, which for the first time established the Scottish border with England as a line running from the Solway to the Tweed.

On either side of the border there were three ‘marches’ or areas of administration, the West, East, and Middle Marches, and a warden governed these.

Complaints from either side of the border were dealt with on Truce Days, when the wardens of the different marches would act as arbitrators.

There was also a law known as the Hot Trod, that granted anyone who had their livestock stolen the right to pursue the thieves and recover their property.

The post of March Warden was a powerful and lucrative one, with rival families vying for the position, and the marches became virtually a law unto themselves.

In the Scottish borderlands, the Homes and Swintons dominated the East March, while the Armstrongs, Maxwells, Johnstones, and Grahams were the rulers of the West March – the ancient homelands of the Moffats.

The Kerrs, along with the Douglases and Elliots, held sway in the Middle March.

Wardens from the East Marches met at Redden Burn, on the Tweed, just west of Wark, while wardens for the Middle Marches met at Deadwater, on the North Tyne.

A record exists from 1398 of an agreement between commissioners for Scotland and England that the men of Nithsdale, Galloway, Crawfordmuir, and Annandale – home of the Moffats – should meet the wardens of the West March at the ‘Clochmabanstane’ for redress.

Also known as the Lochmaben Stone, or the Clochmaben Stone, the Moffats would have been frequent visitors to this granite bulk, situated about a mile southwest of Gretna, on a small rise of ground at the head of the Solway Firth, at Sulwath.

By 1504, the Moffats appear to have still been in royal favour, because two men were hanged in the Borders for the murder of Thomas Moffet, described as one of the king’s liegemen, or trusted officials, despite the fact that many of his relations were still notorious reivers.

One of the Moffats’ most powerful enemies were the Johnstones of the West March who, in 1557 exacted a murderous retribution on the family by killing Robert Moffat, the family chief, and several of his kinsfolk by setting fire to a building in which they had gathered.

By May of 1583 two Moffats incurred the wrath of the authorities for crimes that included fire-raising and murder, while in the same year a Gilbert Hay of Monkstown is on record as complaining of how a band of Moffats had raided his lands, leaving a trail of devastation in their pillaging wake.

Four years later, in 1587, the Scottish parliament declared the Moffats to be ‘an unruly clan of the Western Marches’, while in 1594 the parliament drew up a series of harsh measures ‘to suppress the lawless Moffats and other Border clans.’

The lawless state of affairs was no better by 1608, however, when a Privy Council report graphically described how the ‘wild incests, adulteries, convocation of the lieges, shooting and wearing of hackbuts, pistols, lances, daily bloodshed, oppression, and disobedience in civil matters, neither are nor has been punished.’

The final death knell for the Moffats was finally sounded in 1609, however, when a special commission set up by James VI arranged that many of the lands the family had held for centuries should be sold off to their bitter enemies, the Johnstones.

Many Moffats remained in the Borders, but many others were dispersed and sought a new life elsewhere.

Some of the lands lost to the Moffats were re-purchased by their descendants in the early years of the twentieth century.

The family’s proud heritage was recognised in 1983 when Major Francis Moffat of Craigbeck was recognised by the Lord Lyon King of Arms of Scotland as hereditary clan chief, with the designation of Moffat of that Ilk.

Following his death in 1992, his daughter succeeded to the title as Madame Jean Moffat of that Ilk.

‘I hope for better things’ is the motto of the Moffats, while the crest is a coronet and cross.

Read more

Family History Mini Book

We hope you enjoyed reading this excerpt from this mini book on the Scottish history of the Moffat family.

You can buy the full book for only
$4.97

The Crests

of Clan Moffat

Clan Moffat
Clan Moffat
Clan Moffat
Clan Moffat

Spellings

of Moffat

Maffit
Meffat
Meffet
Moffatt
Moffet
Moffett
Moffit
Moffitt
Moffot
Muffet